Friday, November 20, 2009
FOIM 2010 Calendar - Photos Needed!
Once we've made selections we will be in touch with those families to gather further info, obtain permissions and finalize the calendar design.
It is our goal to have the calendars available for the new year, so the sooner you submit, the sooner our beautiful calendar of Iowa homebirth families will be available!
Any questions you have about the calendar can be directed to the foimcalendar@yahoo.com email. Please forward to anyone you think may be interested in participating.
Thanks!
Monday, September 14, 2009
How You Can Help Foim, #4
Thursday, September 3, 2009
Amazing Supporters Come Through for Us!
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
1) Prairieland Herbs gift basket
2) Moby D baby carrier from The Stork Wearhouse
3) Red Avocado restaurant $50 gift certificate, Dinner for 2
4) One Placenta Encapsulation from Sabbath Davies of Ganesa Birth Services
5) Natural Parenting Fiber Artists knitting gift basket
6) Des Moines Social Club T-shirt and $25 gift certificate
7) Gourmet Wine and Champagne Basket with Truffles and Stemware
8) Blown Glass jewelry pendent from artist Derek Akers $25 value
9) Size 24 mo. tie dyed one piece romper and newborn tie dye set from Foursquare Fibre
10) Infant cloth shoes from Wallypop
11) Children’s Board Book Basket with Homebirth Books
12) Cloth Snack Bag and reusable Sandwich Wrap from Wallypop
13) Glass Magnet Sets from Sarah Nevins
14) 7 Kenneth Huff prints from Amanda McGuire
15) One 60 minute Massage from Zachary Hoover of The Family Tree
16) Gift certificates for one month of adult classes and one month of children’s classes from Roots Capoiera Wellness Center
17) Gift certificate for four beginner guitar, bass or drum lessons from Central Iowa Music Lab-James Biehn $75 value
18) 3 packages of Soap Nuts natural laundry soap from The Stork Wearhouse
19) One pair of earrings from MC Ginsberg
20) Reiki Session by Mia Countryman
21) One handpainted bag from Cover Art by Mia Countryman
22) One glass sunflower picture frame from Amanda McGuire
23) One Japanese Maple or plantings of equal value; including labor to install and a landscaping consultation of the property. By Earth Designs - Beth and Rob Jackson valued at $200, opening bid is $50
24) Two glass candle holders from Amanda McGuire
25) Cross Pen Set and Blank Notecards from Syracuse Cultural Workers from Amanda McGuire and Jessica Bottenfield-Biehn
26) Satchel Paige Wooden Picture Frame from Simply for Giggles
27) Painted Wooden toy Rabbit from Simply for Giggles
28) One hardcover copy of the book “Pushed” from Diane Tinker of Birth Companion Doula Services
29) 6 pewter birth jewelry pieces
30) One piece of framed Birth Art/Kanji from Sabbath Davies
31) One piece of framed Goddess Art from Sabbath Davies
32) ICAN of Central Iowa gift pack including one ICAN 2010 Calendar, and books “Giving Birth” and “Cesarean Voices”
33) Gift Basket from The Possibilities Room
34) CD from singer/songwriter Mary McAdams
35)30 minute Imagine Peace Massage gift certificate- Maggie McGinnis
36) SMASH gift certificate
37) Diaper Dudee Diaper Service gift certificate from Andrea Foley
38) One comprehensive Well Woman Exam including Pap smear from Cosette Boone, CNM $150 value
39) Wildflower Massage gift certificate
40) Gift Certificate for belly dance classes from unda Belly Dance
41) Breastfeeding Basket for New Moms from Lauren Whitehead
42) Handmade hair bows from Sarah Nevins
43) Oasis gift basket w/ 2 t-shirts and $25 gift certificate
44) Oasis gift basket w/ 2 t-shirts and $25 gift certificate
45) Prenatal Massage gift certificate from Inner Balance $80 value
46) Family photograph package from Shuva Rahim of Accent Photographics
47) HUGS Selendang baby sling
48) HUGS Selendang baby sling
49)Size S long sleeve Breastmilk t-shirt & Size 2T shortsleeve Breastmilk t-shirt from The Stork Wearhouse
50)Two 6 month infant tie dyed short sleeve shirts from Wallypop
51) Instant Fiesta Basket with margarita mix, homemade salsa and 4 margarita glasses
52) Kid’s Craft and Snack Basket with Art supplies and workbooks from Jessica Bottenfield-Biehn
53) Belly Cast kit from The Stork Wearhouse
54) Red Avocado restaurant T-shirt
55) WAHM mai tai baby carrier with pink/tan dragonflies from Jenn Bowen
56) Women’s hair cut and 2 products from Blondies Hair Salon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Central Iowa gets some Press!
Monday, August 31, 2009
Day(s) Late and A Dollar Short....
Saturday, August 22, 2009
Check out This Blog!
Friday, August 21, 2009
Thing to Do, #2
Thursday, August 13, 2009
URGENT ACTION NEEDED
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Way to Help #1
How Can I Help Friends of Iowa Midwives??
What a great question – and its one we get from potential supporters, every week. I am inaugurating here, a weekly blog posting featuring 50 great ways you can support midwifery in the state of Iowa.
Sometimes, the action will require bravery, other times it will require spunk; sometimes, a supporter will need to use a special skill that maybe you and only you have, other times it is so simple anyone can do it.
Check back weekly for a suggestion about how you – yes you! – can help make out-of-hospital birth more accessible for more Iowa families.
--Renee
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Leaving Birmingham, Planning to PUSH at Home!
Monday, July 13, 2009
Best One Liner from Big Push, so far!
States Report on their Progress
The purpose of The Big Push National Birth Summit is to help organize activists and advocates from every state where direct entry or Certified Professional Midwife attended homebirth is still illegal or unlicensed. We’ll spend all day Monday and Tuesday meeting with each other, as well as organizers from the national Big Push campaign, to talk strategy, success, and failure. We’ll gain nuts and bolts knowledge, as well as mutual support and solidarity!
And, at the same time, we’ll have a lot of fun! Sunday night we are all meeting up at The Bottle Tree , a Birmingham venue, for a night of music provided by Vulture Whale , 13 ghosts ,Duquette Johnston , John Jeremiah Sullivan , and Kate Taylor in benefit of the Alabama Birthing Coalition. And, academic dork that I am, I am looking forward to the “fun” of hearing a lunchtime presentation on African American midwifery in the Deep South, by Shafia Monroe ofThe International Center for Traditional Childbearing .
I imagine a bit of fun and information sharing during informal times, too – especially with my roommate Debbie Pease, an amazing organizer for South Dakota Safe Childbirth Options .
I’ll keep everyone posted on what I learn, do, and see this week – and I can’t wait to share with members of Friends of Iowa Midwives when we have a general membership meeting and picnic this fall!
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Benefit Dinner at Red Avocado
Hope to see you there!
Sunday, March 15, 2009
Moving Forward
Thanks to you, our active members, and your outpouring of letters and emails to key representatives, we have made some very good progress this week.
On Thursday, the State Government committee voted 20-1 in favor of setting up a Scope of Practice Review (SOPR) Committee to make recommendations on our midwife licensure bill. SOPR establishes a review board made up of interested parties -- midwives, nurses, homebirth parents, doctors, FOIM members -- to discuss the bill and make recommendations.
We did not have enough votes to pass the licensure bill itself out of committee, but setting up a Scope of Practice Review means that our bill and our issue will be kept alive through regular meetings at the state house between now and January, and that we will be in good place to pass a law licensing direct-entry midwives in the next legislative session, beginning in January 2010. We see this as a great opportunity to educate a lot of legislators before the next session.
A bit of history: In the year 2000, the Iowa Midwives Association brought a similar licensure bill to the Iowa legislature. That bill was also assigned to a Scope of Practice Review committee, and after the review process, the committee did recommend licensure. However, although the activists and midwives at work at that time were a very dedicated group, Iowa did not have the statewide grassroots support network that we have now, and the bill was not re-introduced the following session.
Ten years ago, there were only a handful of legal states. Now there are 25 states with licensure and a lot of studies backing our position, so we have confidence that the Scope of Practice Review committee will support a model of care that has been proven to be both health-promoting and cost-effective in other states.
And because of our incredible momentum and ever-growing membership base, we know that this struggle will not be over until we have reached our goal: accessible home birth with legal midwives for Iowa families!
Please stay tuned for more upcoming information on events and actions that are in the planning stages. As always, please contact us if you'd like to be more involved by starting a local chapter, meeting with your legislators, or hosting an event or fundraiser. And as always, thank you for your dedication to expanding birth options in Iowa! Your participation makes this all possible!
Last but not least, please take a moment to thank the following members of the House State Government committee for their support:
Rep. Mary Mascher, Rep. Jeff Kauffman, and Rep. Nate Willems have been unwaveringly supportive, and are truly dedicated to our cause. They have gone above and beyond, spreading the word to other representatives about why Iowa needs midwives, and encouraging us in our efforts. Please send them an email, or better yet, a thank you card to express your gratitude!
The rest of the members of the State Government Committee also deserve thank you emails for voting in favor of scope of practice review for HSB 229 (with the exception of Rep. Wendt, who was the only vote against it.) You can find links to contact info for all the members of the State Government Committee here.
Thanks again for all you do!
Monday, March 9, 2009
Lobby Day @ Capitol WED MAR 11!!
In anticipation of a possible committee vote this Thursday, we are holding our second lobby day on Wed. March 11, from 9:30-2:30. Please join us in Des Moines!
We will be congregating near the state capitol cafeteria on the ground floor. Steering committee members will be present throughout the day, and will accompany you upstairs to help you find your representatives and talk with them about why Iowa needs licensed midwives!
You are welcome to come any time between 9:30-2:30. Please dress as nicely as possible. Business casual is fine, suits are great. No t-shirts or overtly political clothing, please. Babies in arms and well-behaved children are welcome.
RSVP to Sabbath Davies: SabbathD@gmail.com
Meeting with your representatives in person makes a powerful statement -- we hope to see you Wednesday!
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Follow FOIM on twitter!!
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Subcommittee Update
SUBCOMMITTEE MEETINGS
We had our first subcommittee meeting yesterday (Monday). Representatives Mascher (our sponsor), Willems (Mt Vernon – a supporter) and Kaufmann (Wilton – a supporter) are on the subcommittee.
The meetings work like this: everyone interested in the bill sits around the table. The bill is introduced and then everyone with interest gets to make a statement/ask questions. The room was packed! We had members from Iowa City and Des Moines there to support midwifery licensure, including a nurse, midwives, and homebirth parents. While the medical lobby emphatically stated is opposition to our cause, they didn’t have much in the way of facts or data to back up their opinions. We did! Overall, the feedback of our performance at Monday’s meeting was that it went amazingly well and that FOIM has a very professional and convincing presence. THANK YOU TO THE FOIM MEMBERS WHO REPRESENTED US ON MONDAY!
Because so many people were there, a second meeting to continue the discussion has been scheduled for TOMORROW MORNING!
MEDICAL OPPOSITION
The IMS was spooked by our amazing performance and now has doctors flooding legislators with anti-midwifery phone calls and emails. We need to continue showering our reps with advocacy and information.
Although the Iowa Nurses Association initially declared they were against our bill, they have changed their position to Undecided. This is a huge victory for us! It shows that the medical community is not united in their opposition and gives hope that other medical groups will be open to if not supporting us, remaining neutral on our bill.
“SCOPE OF PRACTICE REVIEW”
Our sponsor is beginning to get strong pressure from the medical lobby to slow down the progress of our bill. This afternoon, she gave us the option of holding a Scope of Practice Review Committee instead of proceeding with the bill.
She is thinking that although things look positive with the subcommittee, she will probably not be able to get the bill out of committee by next week, with so little time to educate people on the committee, and with so much "poisoning" as she put it by the doctors. The committee would be made up of stakeholders (a doc, a cnm, someone from public health, a member of our group, etc.) and that they would be charged with studying the issue and making a recommendation to the entire legislature at the beginning of the next session.
This is what happened a decade ago, the first time a licensure bill went to the capitol. What happened last time is that the bill never got picked up again in the following session after the SOPR committee recommended that the IA legislature license CPMs.
Her perspective is that with a SOPR, we would be able to keep the issue alive and have info and education going on continuously throughout the interim time between now and January, and that we would be on a stronger footing come January to advance our bill all the way through. She's thinking that if it were to go to committee and then die, we'd have a harder time coming back to it in January.
However, there are significant drawbacks to SOPR. First, we couldn’t assure that midwifery advocacy would have equal representation on the board. It could likely be that the board would have all medical people and one lone midwifery advocate. We could be outnumbered and end up with a recommendation AGAINST licensure. Additionally, SOPR would take the wind out of our sails in terms of momentum. Right now we are making great progress and are very strong. This is clear from the reaction we are getting from the medical community. They’re scared. This would give them time to organize and advance a campaign against us. This would remove the sense of urgency felt by legislators having to focus their attention on lots of issues. Plus, we have shown how strong our grassroots support is: we won’t have any trouble keeping the issue “alive” if it doesn’t make it out of committee this session because our supporters are so great!
Therefore, this evening the Steering Committee agreed unanimously to reject SOPR and keep the bill going. We are attending the subcommittee meeting tomorrow morning so that our bill will be PASSED by the subcom. TOMORROW! (We hope!) Once it gets to committee (a much larger group with some undecided and opposing reps), we will see where we stand in terms of support. If we can get it passed out of committee, WE WILL!! If we can’t, we can let the bill simply lie dormant and then tackle it again next January. In the meantime, we can develop our membership and get our message out!
THE NEXT WEEK IS CRUCIAL. If we go to committee, we need to match and EXCEED the medical anti-midwifery lobby in terms of emails and phone calls to legislators. WE (the steering comm.) are COUNTING ON EVERYONE to make that happen! More specific information will come after the subcommittee meeting.
RALLY DAY UPDATE
We’re getting a lot of questions about a rally day at the capitol. We hope to hold one later in the session. The reason we can’t pin down a day is that (as you can see) these meetings are scheduled at a moment’s notice. We don’t yet know if or when our bill will be heard in committee. We may not know until the day before it happens. It’s tricky to coordinate a large event with such short notice. But be assured that this is a goal and we want to show legislators in person the enthusiasm of our group!! In the meantime, take that rally energy and call your legislators with it! They’re very easy to talk to and a phone call makes a huge impression.
OVERALL
We have a ton to celebrate!! This may be the busiest week of our year in terms of legislative activity, so the list will be extra active with updates on what’s happened and what you can do. Please consider each call to action. The only reason we are where we are is because members are getting legislators interested and informed. Let’s keep it up!!
QUESTIONS, ETC
Email Lauren (laurendoula@yahoo.com) or your chapter leaders with questions, concerns, ideas, etc.
Thursday, February 26, 2009
House Study Bill 229!!!
CORRECTION:
Representative Mascher is our sponsor. AT THIS TIME WE HAVE NO OTHER SPONSORS. We are still working on getting a bill introduced in the senate.
We have our first subcommittee meeting scheduled at the capitol at 4:00 on Monday.
Our lobbying day at the capitol was an amazing success. Not only did we secure support from many legislators across the state, we:
- made contact with the Dept of Health, who will house our licensing board, to learn how we can work with them
- made contact with several supportive lobbyists in the areas of maternal and child health
- found out that the Iowa Hospital Association will NOT be blocking our bill (yay!)
- found out (unsurprisingly) that the Iowa Medical Associate will actively fight our bill (boo!)
As a first-timer to the capitol I was intimidated, but it was actually pretty easy. Legislators are eager to hear from constituents and want to learn more about our cause. The face-to-face time made a huge impact and gave all attendees a huge boost!
The #1 thing I learned is this: our legislators know NOTHING about midwifery. We are educating from the ground up. And even more significantly, the medical lobby has NOT YET started spreading misinformation against us. This is the ONLY TIME we will EVER have total control of our message. We MUST take advantage of this. WE NEED A FLOOD OF LETTERS TO THE CAPITOL to follow up this great event. ASK THEM TO SUPPORT HSB 229!!
Handwritten is best, snail mail is best!
Be sure to mention HSB 229.
You can always refer them to the FOIM website for more information.
We are planning another rally day in March (an all-hands, bring your kids type thing). We will get a date to you ASAP.
Questions or concerns? Email me! laurendoula@yahoo.com
Lauren
Friday, February 13, 2009
Red Envelope Parties & Consumer Report on Maternity Care
Consumer Reports just released a great summary of the Millbank Report (2008) that chides hospitals for the overuse of risky interventions and promotes the use of midwives for maternity care. Also check out this informative quiz on maternity care that debunks myths about maternity health care. A great little thing to forward to doubting friends, family, or legislators!
Saturday, February 7, 2009
Op-ed supporting licensure runs in Press-Citizen
Unfortunately, in this rather faceless age of technology and science, the medically trained are taught that birth is inherently dangerous. Life threatening at that. On the other hand, midwives view pregnancy not as a cause for alarm and concern, but as a normal, historical, organic, physiological event. A certified professional midwife's practice includes careful screening for any evidence of high risk factors and will only accept healthy pregnant women.
Occasionally non-emergent transports are called for. However, certified professional midwives have the skill and training to stabilize a woman until additional care is obtained. Additionally, they are professionally trained, like nurses, in skills such as neonatal resuscitation, treatment of excessive bleeding, etc.
Since certified professional midwives have only one focused specialty, the licensing of these professionals will provide an additional support for the medical establishment. A 21st century, mutually supportive, collaborative relationship with medical professionals will insure a much higher quality of safe birthing experiences merging science, the letter of the law, with spirit.
What a beautifully written argument for licensure!!
Saturday, January 31, 2009
"Bravery" has nothing to do with it
When hearing the news that I had my last baby at home and am planning to have this one at home as well, the first response from most people is, "You're so brave."
This has to be one of the most irritating things that people say to homebirthers. The implication is that birth is dangerous and that we are willing to take on a tremendous risk to do it anywhere but a hospital. It negates the research and planning that we've done to come to this decision. It makes the choice about balls, not brains. After all, homebirth is "dangerous." Hospital birth is "safe." Therefore, it must be bravado alone that would lead a woman to choosing such an option. Right?
In 2003, over 20% of women had their labors induced, with a rate closer to 40% in many hospitals, while that rate should not exceed 10% (and has remained at 10% in most industrialized nations). Inductions are approximately 5 times more likely among planned hospital births than planned homebirths. An 1999 American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology "Green Journal" review of 7000 inductions found that 3 out of 4 of the inductions were not medically necessary. Inductions are performed unnecessarily for estimated size of the baby (too large or too small), going past the estimated due date, amniotic fluid levels that are low but not critically low (correctable in nearly all cases by rehydration of the mother), rupture of membranes without immediate start of labor, the mother being dilated/effaced but not in active labor, or scheduling reasons on the part of the mother or care provider. Approximately 40-50% of inductions fail (depending on the induction method used and the mother's Bishop score), and most failed inductions end in cesarean section. Inductions increase labor pain and length, and create, among other problems, an increased risk of fetal distress, uterine rupture, and cesarean section.
But homebirth is "dangerous." Hospital birth is "safe."
Over 30% of women in the US have cesarean sections, while overwhelming research has led the World Health Organization to set an ideal standard rate of cesarean sections at 10-12%, with 15% being the rate where more harm is being done instead of good. Cesareans are performed at a similar rate across all risk groups, low to high. The cesarean rate for planned births at home or in an independent birthing center is approximately 4%. Cesarean sections increase the likelihood of maternal death by as much as 4 times, and have other immediate and long-term heath risks for mothers that include, but are not limited to, infection, bowel or bladder perforation, hysterectomy, future infertility, and increased risk of uterine rupture for future pregnancies. Risks for the baby include respiratory distress, fetal injury, prematurity (if result of schedule section or failed induction), and breastfeeding difficulties. Four of the greatest causes for the increase in cesarean section are overuse of interventions during labor, concern for malpractice/liability on the part of care providers, failed labor inductions, and "failure to progress" (labor not progressing fast enough or regularly enough for care providers).
But homebirth is "dangerous" and hospital birth is "safe."
The ACOG and AMA have both come out against homebirthing, calling it a dangerous trend and referring to it as a "fashionable, trendy, [...] the latest cause célèbre," and they paint a horrible picture of complications arising in low-risk pregnancies with no warning that cannot be handled anywhere but the hospital. Despite that, the most thorough study ever done on homebirth safety, Kenneth C Johnson and Betty-Anne Daviss's Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America, BMJ 2005;330:1416 (18 June), found that the outcomes of planned homebirths for low risk mothers were the same as the outcomes of planned hospital births for low risk mothers, with a significantly lower incident of interventions in the homebirth group. The Lewis Mehl Study of home and hospital births, which matched couples in each group for age, parity, education, race, and pregnancy/birth risk factors, found the hospital group had 9 times the rate of episiotomies and tearing, 3 times the cesarean rate, 6 times the fetal distress, 2 times the use of oxytocin for induction/augmentation, 9 times the use of analgesia/anesthesia, 5 times the rate of maternal blood pressure increase, 3 times the rate of maternal hemorrhage, 4 times the rate of infection, 20 times the rate of forceps use, and 30 times teh rate of birth injuries (including skull fractures and nerve damage). Breastfeeding success rates are higher and postpartum depression rates are lower for planned homebirths.
But homebirth is "dangerous" and hospital birth is "safe."
The United States spends more per pregnancy/birth than any other country, the vast majority of women in the US give birth in hospitals, and yet the US's maternal death rate is the worst among 28 industrialized nations and the neonatal mortality rate is the second worst. The Netherlands, where 36% of babies are born at home, has lower maternal and neonatal mortality rates than the US. Denmark, where all women have access to the option for a safe and legal home birth, has one of the lowest maternal and neonatal mortality rates.
But homebirth is "dangerous," hospital birth is "safe," and Brutus is an honorable man.
I didn't choose a homebirth because I am brave. Bravery has little to do with it. If anything, I believe women who choose to give birth in US hospitals are the brave ones, because knowing what I know about our technocratic obstetrical system, I can't imagine voluntarily choosing an obstetrician and a hospital for anything but absolute medical necessity. My decision to homebirth wasn't made in a void, but based upon years of research. I wonder how much research the average woman puts into her hospital birth? Considering how many times I've heard someone say "I'm glad I was in the hospital because..." and then given as her reason a non-emergent situation (such as fetal size or nuchal cords), I'd say not that much.
Call me stubborn, because I wasn't willing to accept out of hand the culturally held belief that hospitals are safer. Call me an idealist, because I believe that birth can be a positive, safe, and empowering experience for child and mother. Call me a nonconformist, because I choose to birth at home in defiance of a powerful technocratic system. Call me outspoken, because I can't keep my mouth shut when I hear about yet another iatrogenic birth calamity. Call me a "birth nazi," because I believe it's the right and responsibility of every woman to educate herself about birth and take ownership of her birth experience.
But brave? Don't call me brave. "Brave" has nothing to do with it.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
AP article on Big Push
The states are now evenly split on legal recognition of certified professional midwives (CPMs) — those who lack nursing degrees and who account for most midwife-assisted home births.
Half the states have procedures allowing CPMs to practice legally — including five which have taken such steps since 2005. The other 25 states lack such procedures and CPMs are subject to prosecution for practicing medicine without a license.
Depending on legislative decisions, the balance could shift this year. Among the battlegrounds:
_In North Carolina, a House study committee recommended in December that the legislature develop licensing standards for CPMs. The committee said the current system doesn't meet the needs of women who chose non-hospital births because of the "extremely limited supply" of obstetricians and nurse-midwives offering to handle such births.
_In Idaho, advocates who failed previously to get a voluntary licensing bill through the legislature are back with a mandatory licensing bill. State Rep. Janice McGeachin, R-Idaho Falls, says the changes helped persuade the state boards of nursing and pharmacy to drop their opposition. The Idaho Medical Association, which fought the earlier version, has expressed respect for the changes in the bill and is deliberating on whether further changes might produce a version it could accept.
_In Illinois, advocates also are back with a new version of a licensing bill that failed in 2007. Rep. Julie Hamos, D-Evanston, says it toughens qualification standards for CPMs — changes that prompted the Illinois Nurses Association to drop its opposition. The Illinois State Medical Society remains opposed.
The challenges are real but the momentum is in our favor. Let's make Iowa the tipping state!
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Quad Cities Chapter!
Monday, January 12, 2009
New Year, New News!
First and most exciting, FOIM leaders and members met with Rep. Mary Mascher from Iowa City to discuss our cause. The room was filled with parents and babies and everyone eloquently argued for their stake in making out-of-hospital birth accessible to all Iowans. Mary was warm and supportive and gave us a ton of great ideas for making this a reality.
Second, it looks like a Quad Cities chapter of FOIM is in the making! If you are a Quad Cities member and want to be in on the action, please contact me and I'll put you in touch with its organizers. Hopefully we will have FOIM in all corners of the state soon.
We have a lot of amazing plans for the next few months as the legislative session opens. The bill committee is working on a draft to shop around and we are scheduling meetings with representatives.
What can you do?
First, write a letter. Please! You would be amazed at the difference these letters make. We need FOIM to be in the hearts and minds of our legislators and the only way to do that is for them to hear directly from constituents. Our website has a great section all about writing letters.
Second, schedule a meeting with your representative. As a consumer who cares about this issue, a face to face meeting -- even for a few minutes -- will make a great impact. Bring your babies/kids! Legislators are home on weekends and are happy to meet with constituents at that time. Gather a few friends from your area and go together. Bring handouts and talking points to share!
Looking forward to a GREAT YEAR!